Recent content by HelpNowPlease

There is already evidence pointing to the physical interpretation of the wave function.

There is only something to collapse, if it has something to deflate in the first place. Maybe the real question is, whether the wave function is objective or subjective. In other words, it is merely a field which is there for us to keep track of our calculations? Early quantum field theorists...

Madam, why is my thread being discussed, do I have no say in the matter?

I created a thread in skeptisism about how the collapse of the wave function causes collapse, why was it deleted? Regards

I have a new question, why does c^5 show up in the calculations, is there a significant reason for this, other than balancing the dimensions?

So it is... I never thought to check the plank energy. I found this independantly lol

take this derivation \hbar c = GM^2 multiply c^4 on both sides \hbar c^5 = GM^2c^4 rearrange \frac{\hbar c^5}{G} = M^2c^4 Take the square root makes \sqrt{\frac{\hbar c^5}{G}} = E Now this \sqrt{\frac{\hbar c^5}{G}} expression inside the radical expression is...

Ok thank you. I have another question. My teacher was showing us a way to check the dimensions of equations. He showed us this LMT So if something has mass x t dimensions, it can be given as LMT/L it can also be written as L-1MT is this right? If I wanted to multiply two values...

My teacher said e2 c x ħ/R Where e is the electric charge, c is speed of light and h is reduced constant and R is radius. My teacher said this has dimenions of energy, is this right?