Recent content by iamcj

The horizontal path of the left photon is measured/blocked and replaced with the horizontal path of the right photon. If the right photon and the left photon both become vertically polarized after the the first BPS. The left photon will continu to the second PBS as a vertically polarized...

I am sorry. In the original experiment, if you block one path, this influences the behaviour of the other path. The proposed experiment would prove that there is really nothing going on in the path that you block, in that case you would only get vertical and horizontal photons. If you get 45...

In the original experiment a photon 45 degrees polarized goes through two beamsplitters and comes out 45 degrees polarized and if you measure the individual path, you measure vertical or horizontal. I was just wondering, has the experiment below (or something simular) ever been done? Do we...

Tnx for your perspective. I am not English so maybe in the translation some nuances that are there for you I don't get. What I meant is that your explanation that time is not in the formula itself is not enough to rule out time and just a fun example. I appreciate your help and patience with me...

I am sorry to have offended you. Please tell me where I am wrong, so I can get these ideas out of my head.

So we have two guys over here. One is holding the pendulum that he will be swinging and keep it in motion. The guy with the red T-shirt will put the ball on the spot at random times. 50% of the cases the ball goes forward and is hit with the point of the shoe. 50% of the cases the ball goes...

Tnx for your answers. It makes things somewhat more clear to me. I would like for you to join me in a thought experiment where time does play a role. The real big question for me is why in the Bell experiments photon A gets absorbed and B gets not. From QM we can predict the percentage, but we...

I indeed visualize a photon vibrating in some way. And if I interpret this information, +-h is based on time as you also point out? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_angular_momentum_of_light#/media/File:Sam_v1.png https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_angular_momentum_of_light Thanks for the...

I don't understand... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon p = h/lambda, that means for momentum there is a relation to frequency thus to time? Or is momentum constant for a given frequency? Can we even measure with the kind of the accuracy that we can observe photons at exactly the same time...

Many tnx for you answer. So if momentum is between -1 and 1. If I measure particle A at 0.2, particle B has -0.2 ? My real question is: for any entangled photon can I say: if the polarization is entangled ( the same) , there is always a property like momentum that moves like this for the two...

Hi, So far I understand that when two particles are entangled measuring the state will provide the same result for both particles. But what I can't figure out: a particle has multiple properties like spin and momentum etc, are all these properties the same (or opposite), or only the one...

:oldsmile:, you are right and I've read that's always 25% 75% no matter the angle. I will give it one more try :oldsmile:

The photons are entangled so they flip their polarity 180 degrees (or some other thing that determins if they go trough or not) at the same time no matter where they are. They are in sync so to say. Lets say they both have a polarity of 0 degrees. The photon that goes trough the 0 filter takes...

Nope, the difference is 120 degrees, that couses the delay between angles. When the angles are let's say 110 and 220 degrees, is the 25% higher according tot QM?

Actually I think, I don't violate Bell, I just bypass it.