iste's latest activity

Which features of Bohm do you find impalatable, out of interest?

No, I did not have this confusion. I did have a confusion in the sense I was thinking about configuration as something arbitrary in...

You don't need another model because its in the theory. The stochastic-quantum correspondence surely says that momentum basis and any...

i'm thinking that maybe the issue is that the stochastic correspondence clearly overs more than just what you are referring to in terms...

Yes, but my point is that surely position and momentum basis in quantum mechanics would each be translated to respective classical...

But it doesn't seem to me that there is any preferred basis of configurations. Surely, Barandes formulation doesn't stop you from...

My contention is that if you take the stochastic-correspondence at face value, then presumably you can describe polarization in some...

My inclination is that emergeables must be as real as beables. In terms of measurement and the Born rule they seem on equal footing. The...

Emergeables aren't real in the sense that they do not correspond to different possible configurations of the measured system the way...

It is the vocabulary preferred by Asher Peres over "measurement". A measurement implies a reading of some pre-existing property of a...

What does a test mean?

I have some questions I wonder what you think. What is the ontological status of emergeables? Are they as real as the beables but just...

I can't do much with "It just seems clear to me." but I am happy to respond to some substantive concern.

Nevermind, after thinking about it and looking at Albert's document I can see how my revised view was the wrong picture and can see how...

I don't understand what you mean, I have just pointed at a fact about the theory that it requires the measurement device as part of the...