iste's latest activity
-
iste replied to the thread Undergrad Valid local explanation of Bell violations? (Pegg et al., 1999; 2008).Thats strange, it gives me as of now both the full article on the page and a pdf link. I can only offer a different link... -
iste posted the thread Undergrad Valid local explanation of Bell violations? (Pegg et al., 1999; 2008) in Quantum Interpretations and Foundations.These papers by Pegg et al. (doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.02.003 [section 4]...
-
iste reacted to Peter Morgan's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with
Like.
Put in an extreme instrumental form, I think "The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments"... -
iste reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality with Like.
Yes, this is really very relevant! In section 4.1, it says: "Then, in Equation (3) of [9], it implicitly assumes ##p(abcd|xy) =...
-
iste reacted to Fra's post in the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality with Like.
The Stochastic-Quantum Theorem (SQT?) is an embedding theorem saying that a general stochastic system GSS can always mathematically be...
-
iste reacted to Fra's post in the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality with Like.
Jusy to explain the "philosophy" what I had in mind is not just word plany, its just related to a computational complexity association...
-
iste replied to the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality.Thought these papers might be relevant to realist perspective on Wogner friend: https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/24/7/903 Note how...
-
iste reacted to Morbert's post in the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality with Like.
I don't see how the bit in bold is true if dynamics are non-Markovian. [edit] - I.e.: AOE + Markovian dynamics = joint probability...
-
iste replied to the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality.Why does the configuration need to jump between branches? I haven't really been following this topic.
-
iste replied to the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality.Where does he talk about the even more general stochastic process? In that paper says he changes from the squiggly X to C because you...
-
iste replied to the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality.But the generalized stochastic process exists! Again, the stochastic-quantum correspondence is fully general and can be applied to...
-
iste replied to the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality.Sure, but then you could postulate anything. You can talk about physical systems that don't exist, you can talk about macroeconomics...
-
iste replied to the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality.My criticism is that if you take something like spin and translate it into a generalized stochastic process, you get an evolving...
-
iste reacted to Fra's post in the thread Undergrad Question about discussions around quantum interpretations with Like.
When discussing "interpretations" my perspective is always on solving the open foundational problems such as for example Reduce fine...
-
iste replied to the thread Graduate Understanding Barandes' microscopic theory of causality.I have to clarify that the ontological ambiguity with regard to the indivisible stochastic process has nothing to do with configuration...