iste's latest activity

Sure, but the quantum dictionary and the Born rule basically have the same form. The difference is kind of trivial, and I think that can...

He is just postulating their existence. There is nothing in the formalism saying that there are multi-time joint probabilities. He is...

Yes, its definitely a Kuhnian shift as it introduces something that implies a new ontology or metaphysics that didn't exist before. I...

Yes, but Barandes explicitly says that such a process exists underlying the indivisible probabilities. He is saying there is an...

No, the correspondence is between the operator formalism and a conditional probability in a manner no fundamentally different to the...

A stochastic process has to have multi-time joint probabilities. Barandes theory doesn't give you any which means that the...

I don't find anything impalatable with a stochastic picture. I think its probably the most desirable kind of hidden variable...

Its only not a deficiency if you think its trivial to construct a stochastic process that fulfils all the properties you want it to with...

I now listened to the key part where Albert keeps asking what is the fundamental law but isn't satisfied with Barandes saying "it's just...

Well, they could be lawlike, Barandes isn't specifying whether they are lawlike or not because he doesn't have any access to them...

On that same video there are statements of the sort all through about 1:17 to 1:46, and quite a clear concise summary from about 1:42 -...

I might try to find exactly where in videos but pretty sure Barandes talks about the towers of probabilities for a stochastic process...

The discussion did not just "feel" more substantive. What I have watched so far (~1h 43min) was factually a lot more substantive than...