How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics?

[DarkloidNeos]

TL;DR

As on the tin

I was reading up on the theory and apparently it's saying stuff that is in direct opposition with current views like how there is no wave function, but that quantum processes occur by randomness? I'm not sure how valid it might be but all I know is that it's a massive departure from the usual stuff.

 

[PeterDonis]

Moderator's note: Thread moved to the QM interpretations subforum.

 

[PeterDonis]

I was reading up on the theory

Where? Please give a specific reference. "The indivisible interpretation" is not any recognized interpretation that I've heard of.