javisot's latest activity

"In this way, RQM succeeds in making sense of a fully quantum world without requiring hidden variables, many worlds, physical collapse...

You missed this part: "even these events can be described in a different way by different physical systems". This is the part I would...

Please don't create confusion. The paragraph you mentioned and tried to correct is by Rovelli, not me. My words don't confirm...

Well, since this has touched on Realism, I suggest reading Fields and their Quanta by Art Hobson...

? No, it's a paragraph literally written by Rovelli.

The first sentence is a response to those who argue that RQM would be a solipsistic interpretation. Somehow, the typical confusion...

I insist that in Rovelli's RQM vision, objects don't even exist, he says in the article that martinbn shared: "Dorato observes that the...

I don't understand, physica; what you're correcting isn't a paragraph of mine, it's Rovelli's. Furthermore, I don't understand the...

I agree with Greg, this thread is not meant to offend Fresh42, Greg himself has used it to apologize.

I think this thread shows the community cares about @fresh_42. What guideline does it violate?

The first part: "There is nothing in RQM that contradicts the assumption that the world is “out there”, irrespectively of our mental...

No. (Maybe some crazy physicist, but usually not)

Gödel's original solution does not contain black holes. Other Kerr-Gödel-type solutions may include them, for example...

This seems like a reasonable stance, since what happens between measurements is conflict and a source of interpretations; let's stick...

Thanks for the reference @martinbn! I've been reading a bit about all this and I'd like to add something that I think is interesting...