javisot's latest activity
-
JI think this thread shows the community cares about @fresh_42. What guideline does it violate?
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.The first part: "There is nothing in RQM that contradicts the assumption that the world is “out there”, irrespectively of our mental...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad Do existing EFE solutions support Closed Timelike Curves?.No. (Maybe some crazy physicist, but usually not)
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad Do existing EFE solutions support Closed Timelike Curves?.Gödel's original solution does not contain black holes. Other Kerr-Gödel-type solutions may include them, for example...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.This seems like a reasonable stance, since what happens between measurements is conflict and a source of interpretations; let's stick...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with
Like.
Thanks for the reference @martinbn! I've been reading a bit about all this and I'd like to add something that I think is interesting... -
Jjavisot reacted to cianfa72's post in the thread Undergrad Do existing EFE solutions support Closed Timelike Curves? with Like.
Hi, I'm curious about the following: taking the point of view of the standard physics of spacetime including EFE's solutions, are there...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad Do existing EFE solutions support Closed Timelike Curves?.There are many EFE solutions that violate some, several, or all of the energy conditions. In addition to Gödel's universe, the interior...
-
Jjavisot reacted to martinbn's post in the thread Undergrad Do existing EFE solutions support Closed Timelike Curves? with Like.
Yes, of course. For example the Gödel spacetime.
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Imagine that we were living in a simulation. Everything would look the same, but there would be no force of gravity, as such. A...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
In fact, Rovelli developed the relational interpretation inspired by his work in loop quantum gravity. He discusses this in section 4(c)...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Note that the Rovelli paper above does not consider the question of the existence of an electron, as we have been discussing it here...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Hi @PeroK! Your objections relate to certain metaphysical assumptions that you take for granted, but which RQM rejects. First, I would...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Peter Morgan's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
The fundamental principles of QFT, however, include many measurement operators that can be constructed by smearing the measurement...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.In QM, "particle" means "quantum object." By quantum object, we mean an object for which the uncertainty principle, superposition, etc...