javisot's latest activity
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.To the question "what does the Turing test actually measure?", chatgpt replies: "The Turing Test does not measure “intelligence” in a...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with
Like.
I don't agree with your major hypothesis. I don't think intelligence is required to deceive in the sense the paper you referenced is... -
JTo put it in formal terms, my original argument was: Major hypothesis: only intelligent things can lie (*) Minor hypothesis: this LLM...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.I think you're both right and wrong at the same time. It doesn't take intelligence to generate text that can be interpreted as a lie. A...
-
JLogic doesn't require the terms to be defined. You only need definitions when you want to apply the logic to specific terms. So, yes we...
-
Jjavisot reacted to jack action's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
It sounds more simplistic than logic, especially without definitions of "intelligent" or "lie". To link a lie to intelligence, you must...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.This is already being done, for example by input engineers, or when OpenAI sends "good usage manuals for chatgpt". (Okay, the effort we...
-
JThis is going to have me chuckling for at least a couple days. 😂
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Eliminating all hallucinations, lies, and errors from models isn't something that can be achieved simply by modifying the models. This...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.Correct. I wasn't referring to the model deliberately lying while being aware of it; I meant that the model can generate texts that we...
-
JAgreed. I like these sorts of definitions because they directly address real risks without getting bogged down in these “fuzzy”...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
It also does not require any "awareness" or "understanding" or "intention" to accomplish a given outcome, on the part of whatever is...
-
JThe paper that @PeroK provided gave a decent definition of "deception" for their paper. It is: "We define deception as the systematic...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts? with Like.
Only if the model even has a concept of "incorrect information". I don't think LLMs even have that concept. They're not designed to...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Is A.I. more than the sum of its parts?.The definition of a lie also matters. If we define a lie as giving incorrect information knowing it's not perfectly accurate, then the...