javisot's latest activity
-
Jjavisot reacted to pines-demon's post in the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics? with
Like.
More like Barandes interpretation does not want to define its properties in terms of usual entanglement terminology. I still don’t know... -
Jjavisot replied to the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics?.Barandés' interpretation does not offer the local explanation that we would so much like for any form of entanglement. (Sarcasm mode on)
-
Jjavisot reacted to Morbert's post in the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics? with Like.
This discussion felt a lot more substantive than the discussion with Maudlin, largely because a higher level of familiarity with the...
-
JHey everyone! Missing a favorite forum? It may have moved. Here is an update: Astronomy + Cosmology merge and nests into Physics...
-
Jjavisot reacted to Matterwave's post in the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses" with Like.
I would recommend you to actually read the original EPR paper! It is eminently readable! In EPR they define a necessary (not...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses" with Like.
No, you end up in all branches. You do not end up in just one. So there can't be any "hidden variable" that "determines" that you end up...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses".A change to this paragraph: "we are always observers inside one branch, and from that perspective, it is operationally...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses" with Like.
No, you couldn't, because any such effects would just end up being entangled with everything else, and in any given branch, there would...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses" with Like.
In MWI everything is real, so to speak. In fact, the mathematics of decoherence, treating the detector as a QM system, leads naturally...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses" with Like.
The branching is not a physical process. It's the usual evolution of probability amplitudes. Without decoherence, it's simple state...
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses" with Like.
I don't see how MWI complicates this. It doesn't explain non-locality, but neither does it complicated the question of entangled states.
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses".Perhaps the correct thing to do would be to start another specific thread about MWI with this comment, and have Peter Donis answer directly.
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses".The individual experience of an observer in many worlds is indistinguishable from Copenhagen.
-
Jjavisot reacted to PeroK's post in the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses" with Like.
You haven't understood MWI. MWI is just regular QM without the single outcomes. It's very simple. Decoherence is complicated to get...
-
Jjavisot replied to the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses".Didn't you say that after message 27 we couldn't talk about this anymore and that everything had already been said?