Recent content by javisot

Have you tried IA? You should ask it to critique your idea. It's true that if you ask it to help you create an absurd theory, it will, but if you ask it to find flaws and criticisms in your theories, it will do that too.

Because, in some contexts, a black hole is also treated as a quantum system with S degrees of freedom, where S is proportional to the area of the event horizon.

I'm not sure if this question refers to "destroyed" by spaghettification, or to the information problem (since it mentions black holes and Hawking radiation, therefore QFT).

Perhaps the first thing you need to know is why you haven't asked your question in the right place. A black hole isn't cosmology; it's astrophysics. The difference between cosmology and astrophysics, both branches of physics, is that astrophysics studies astrophysical objects (for example, black...

Hello, you may have heard of the AdS=CFT correspondence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AdS/CFT_correspondence. This correspondence shows that string theory and quantum field theory are capable of generating the same predictions and results, under specific conditions and versions of string theory...

What do you mean by "at there geometric center"? That's indeed a 2D representation and you need to extrapolate it to more dimensions, but you also have to remember that this 2D surface is spacetime, not just space. The center isn't just a point in space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether%27s_theorem

The Bardeen black hole also evaporates via Hawking radiation, but whether the process is unitary seems to depend on adding backreaction, at least in the case of regular black holes (Bardeen-like model) in 2D dilaton gravity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03191

Can I ask you for references on this again?

https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02742 "Dynamical formation of regular black holes", Pablo Bueno (Spain). In this case, they construct the black hole using a tower of infinite corrections. Regular black holes are those that have neither a real horizon nor a singularity; Bardeen's black hole is a...

Could you provide a reference on this? I'm not aware of any that demonstrates the absence of an information paradox in Bardeen black holes. I recall physicist J. Edelstein saying that the information paradox also exists in regular black holes; there is still a black hole and trapped information...

I want to highlight one point: in warp, the energy conditions are violated, and it is precisely the violation of the energy conditions that produces the effective displacement. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.05610

Isn't there a 1960 work by Stueckelberg where he constructs a version with real numbers?

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.09397 "historical debates over the physical reality of the wave functions", J.Barandes

My opinion is: "shut up and calculate"