Recent content by javisot

How does your example differ from mine? In your example, you talk about an AI program capable of solving a problem that a specific programmer cannot. You can also use a calculator to perform a calculation you don't know how to do. In neither case do I think the intelligence resides in the AI...

You can also use a calculator to perform a calculation. Where do you think the intelligence lies in that case?

I remember the anecdote of the second game between Kasparov and Deep Blue. At a certain point in the game, Kasparov got angry because he thought IBM was cheating. Kasparov thought that playing against Deep Blue meant playing against a machine limited to calculating the most probable next move...

Regarding point 1, the common definition of intelligence is the one I mentioned, which can generally be understood as "the ability to solve problems". When we ask about an intelligence comparable to or superior to human intelligence, we are asking about an intelligence capable of solving at...

Intelligence: is the ability to acquire, understand, and apply knowledge to reason, solve problems, and adapt to new situations. In general, it is the ability to solve problems. I still think that a machine capable of solving all existing problems is not intelligent, no more intelligent than...

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3003568 Interesting article. Assuming the conclusions are correct, can we then say that under conditions of greater gravity than Earth's there would be more replication, therefore, a higher bacterial mortality rate and...

It must be my translator; I misspelled it once and now it always translate it that way by default. I don't know how to fix it...

In this case, it's not from Zeilinger, but I would like to see the following translated into Barandés' terms: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2076 I would like to see the translation of, for example, the following works by Zeilinger: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07756 ...

It would be very instructive for everyone if Barandés took a paper by Zeilinger (a world-renowned authority on nonlocality) and translated it completely into his own terms.

There is still work to be done😂 of course A direct example of hallucination might arise if you force him to solve a Millennium Problem.

I suppose there's a big difference between guaranteeing that something is correct and guaranteeing that something is absolutely correct. It may be true that the model guaranteed that its answer is correct (for it, under its conditions, it's correct), but that doesn't mean it's absolutely...

ChatGPT is becoming less prone to hallucinations. The OpenAI team is working to reduce these hallucinations. They are striving to achieve sufficiently detailed process traceability to study the structure of the hallucinations in order to predict and correct them. (Being able to predict "all" of...

Completely agree. Barandés could have simply spoken of classical causality (cause first, then effect) and quantum causality (something different from classical causality). Bell's theorem, according to Bell, tests local causality (classical causality) in Bell-type experiments. If Bell's...

"Our work implies that a violation of the Tsirelson bound requires either a violation of the principle of causal locality, and thus manifestly non-local dynamical laws, or requires laws that cannot be formulated in terms of unistochastic processes." I cannot see in all of Barandés' work where...

Personally, and for the time being, I would characterize Barandés' interpretation as a middle ground between objective collapse and the standard interpretations. It may well explain more results than those interpretations that include objective collapse, but I don't believe it reaches the level...