jbergman's latest activity
-
Jjbergman reacted to haushofer's post in the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses" with
Like.
Perhaps not yet. But geocentric models with arbitrary epicycels also is arbitrarily empirically precise and equivalent to heliocentric... -
Jjbergman reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses" with Like.
There's a difference, though. We know how to quantize everything that isn't gravity: just use the standard framework of quantum field...
-
Jjbergman replied to the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses".Ballentine has a rebuttal which argues that the previous paper is incorrect on that point. The TLDR for me is that combining QM and...
-
Jjbergman replied to the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses".I don't agree with this point completely. If Gravity was semi-classical you still could postulate a MWI theory but it just wouldn't make...
-
Jjbergman replied to the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses".That assumes a working model of quantum gravity that we don't have today. You can easily do an experiment with say a boulder that can go...
-
Jjbergman replied to the thread Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses".I would say, "their claims go beyond what we can test by experiment now". For instance with MWI, one could conceivably devise an...
-
Jjbergman reacted to Matterwave's post in the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics? with Like.
My knowledge on the topic, I must admit, come from like watching 2 YouTube videos of Barandeis describing the subject. (From the...
-
Jjbergman reacted to pines-demon's post in the thread Graduate How valid is the indivisible interpretation of quantum mechanics? with Like.
As interpretations are mostly "what feels right" philosophically, I can argue that it does not help much in understanding the concept of...