- 1,342
- 1,127
Consider the flow of a continuous medium with a smooth velocity field ##\boldsymbol v(x)## in ##\mathbb{R}^3\ni x##. The density of the medium is ##\rho(x)##. Here ##\mathbb{R}^3## is equipped with the standard inner product ##\delta_{ij}##.
By definition, the momentum of a material volume ##D## (where ##D## is a bounded domain in ##\mathbb{R}^3##) is given by the formula:
$$\boldsymbol P=\int_D\boldsymbol v\mu, \qquad(1)$$
where ##\mu=\rho\sqrt g dx^1\wedge dx^2\wedge dx^3## is a differential form (the infinitesimal mass).
And what about formula (1) if we replace ##\mathbb{R}^3## with some other Riemannian manifold with non-zero curvature?
In this case, formula (1) becomes senseless, and I have no idea how to fix it—or if it is even possible.
Any opinions on this?
By definition, the momentum of a material volume ##D## (where ##D## is a bounded domain in ##\mathbb{R}^3##) is given by the formula:
$$\boldsymbol P=\int_D\boldsymbol v\mu, \qquad(1)$$
where ##\mu=\rho\sqrt g dx^1\wedge dx^2\wedge dx^3## is a differential form (the infinitesimal mass).
And what about formula (1) if we replace ##\mathbb{R}^3## with some other Riemannian manifold with non-zero curvature?
In this case, formula (1) becomes senseless, and I have no idea how to fix it—or if it is even possible.
Any opinions on this?