jbriggs444's latest activity
-
jbriggs444 reacted to A.T.'s post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Like.
The problem with Newton's formulation is not that it is too brief, but rather the opposite: He should have skipped the initial prose... -
jbriggs444 reacted to A.T.'s post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Like.
... rather vague. So I addressed a specific point of yours: I gave you examples on how this approach fails and leads to wrong... -
jbriggs444 reacted to A.T.'s post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Like.
And where did that deep but wrong intuition come from? The stated reason given for the disbelief was usually based on cause-effect... -
jbriggs444 replied to the thread Bernoulli vs real life experiment.I've taken the liberty of clarifying your assertion. Yes, I agree that an expansion tank would work for that. -
jbriggs444 replied to the thread Bernoulli vs real life experiment.As drawn, the pressure inside the system is indeterminate. You have a fixed amount of fluid in a container with a fixed volume. No... -
jbriggs444 replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.There is an interpretation that the net of all internal forces in a system is zero. It follows that internal forces alone cannot produce... -
jbriggs444 reacted to fresh_42's post in the thread Einstein vs Newton - Who is your favorite and why? with
Like.
Amelie Emmy Noether. -
jbriggs444 replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.The chosen terms were in Latin. I believe that they were written for the capable learned men of the time: I find the explanation in... -
jbriggs444 reacted to sophiecentaur's post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Sad.
That was what attracted me to the thread because contributors seemed to assume that considering cause and effect would have to be a... -
jbriggs444 replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.As I recall, your argument in this thread started out as an idea about pedagogy. That it was more helpful to accept student intuitions... -
jbriggs444 replied to the thread Cone on horizontal surface.The non slippery condition would dictate the path along which the cone rolls. It would also assure us that the motion along that path is... -
jbriggs444 replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.One does not tell the student that cause and effect do not exist. One tells the student that there is no causal relationship in the... -
jbriggs444 reacted to A.T.'s post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Like.
Nobody is doing that. You can have thoughts about elves and unicorns when applying Newton's 3rd Law, if you like. But physics teaching...