I know that BM is lacking in certain regards but it just rubs me the right way. CI just doesn't work for instance with my example of a developing universe. Either CI or BM is missing something HUGE.
I'm hoping new, recent experiments pertaining to Pilot Wave Theory give it some traction - I'm a bigger fan of a deterministic reality. The fact that some behaviors are being exhibited in a classical environment that many thought were exclusive to the quantum realm are giving me some hope.
I mean, if one supposes CI to be true and that larger particles can't form from uncollapsed quantum building blocks, the only other possible explanation is, well, something divine in nature is observing and measuring from outside our universe or we're encased in some amazing simulation. This is...
Can we assume that bigger units of matter can not form from particles whose wave functions remain "uncollapsed"? If we can, how could the now observable celestial bodies to come into existence when there are no sentient beings actively observing or at least none available to produce classical...
Hey guys and gals, clearly I'm new here, not only new here but new to QM (relatively speaking). I've read a few threads here pertaining to a thought I've been pondering on but the answer doesn't seem clear.
In the Copenhagen interpretation, what qualifies as a "measurement", and/or what...
The name's James, a pleasure to make the acquaintance of you all! I'm an amateur at best in the realm of physics as I have yet to grasp the math behind it all. So here I come to sate my piqued interest and perhaps raise some interesting and possibly unanswered questions that will provide food...