Recent content by Jmeagle

Is a interpretation of retrocsusality a common view?

Im a bit confused when you said events in the future can affect the past but as long as no information can.has this ever happened or is this what you meant by it being theory?

So the experiment is like quantum entanglement?

Has anything ever been proven to affect the past without violating causality?

Can particles affect the past without violating causality?

Is there an interpretation where there is nothing retrocausal?

So you are saying the future can affect the past as long as no information is sent?

Which interpretation is the widely considered as the favorite?

What about events in the future?can they affect the present or past or what that require faster than light methods?

Ok so no back to the future type deal,even for particles or atoms.

So the experiment is nothing new?

Ok,so its wrong to say the future can affect the past or present?because if that were to happen causality would be violated.

So retrocausality or time travel to the past is still impossible?

I Don't know really anything about QM I am just curious.

Im a bit confused,what did the experiment prove?