Recent content by keinve

Where do i begn? first, as others have stated, other civilizations might use different EM waves for the same purpose. Second, since all EM waves travel at the speed of light, they might simply be too far to reach us yet. Third, EM waves can be disrupted by large amounts of physical matter, or by...

it would increase to some extent, till the tension would be similar to jumping on a flat surface. it would most likely break at that point, assuming you made a big enough tension increase in one jump, otherwise, it would gradually decrease... that's not clear, is it?

who knows? they may have a biology that is dependent on methane. besides, it might not be just methane. carbon dioxide, over a long period of time with no oxygen, can be deadly.

i never said that it would be non carbon based life forms or that they would be able to exist without water. i just said that he assumed that they were dependent on exygen. i know that water need oxygen to exist, but he just said that the signature needed to be oxygen, indicating that the...

i see no reason for it to require oxygen at all. there are many others gases. what's to say a technological species would require oxygen? they may be able to breath nitrogen only. or carbon dioxide. your assumptions are based on the idea that all life requires oxygen. also, you said that the...

um, i would say that you're not normal, but i think that's me. i tend to spend a minimum amount of time on homework. always have. no logical point in it if you get everythibng right in class... though, for people who will call me lazy, i tend to do a large amount of side projects, so much of my...

the matter thing is not always true. i mean a singularity is infinitly small, so it doesn't take up space.

'immoral' is a realtive term. what may be immoral to me, may not be immoral to you, and vice versa. due to this, i cannot answer it correctly. suffice to say, as long as a death is painless, i have no problem with it. you might consider this 'immoral', but i do not. i consider willingly causing...

assuming the universe is infinite... yes. there would be infinite copies of the solar system. and in quite a few of these, doctor who would exist. and family guy. and futurama... in a thousand years. halo, in about 500 years.

um... I've only had about 4 and a half hours of sleep, so please disregard anything i say, unless you think it has merit... which it probably won't... 3000-4000: discovery of inhabitable planet with no alterations to current life; discovery of inhabitable planet with no alterations to...

'What happened before the Big Bang?' 'What is north of the north pole?'

the black hole would obviously work, but the merger with andromeda would only affect us if we were at the right place during the merger. but it seems the people here think that humans are the only living creatures on the planet.

yes... but not all of it. to put it simply, the only way to really destroy all life on Earth is to destroy earth. everything I've seen that leaves Earth intact, results in a still diverse life on earth. not as diverse as right now, but radiatition will cause mutations, causing the diversity to...

well, everyone seems to be focusing on humans. even a few of the 'blow up earth' ones can still leave some small bacteria. no one seem to think about that. but they do have merrit for getting US off of earth.

i am not sure if this is the corect place to put this, but i guess it's right. I'm wondering about plausible ways to destroy the earth, or destroy all life on earth, the probablitlity, about how long it would take, and if it can be orchestrated by humans. stating which it would be (death of...