Recent content by koustav

Is my question too silly to expect such an answer?

What motivated the scientists to work on that

What is the reason to unite weak and electromagnetic interaction

The textbook simply mentions that the probability density is not positive definate because of the second order time derivative.so how actually the second derivative creates a problem for probabilistic interpretation

What problem actually arises when we take the second order time derivative in KG equation

there will be vector sign and no square on the last term

Summary:: I am trying to find the exact ground state energy of the hamiltonian.kindly help me with this

why pure rotational spectrum is almost always seen as absorption lines,and not as emission lines?

can you help me with the mathematical proof

are spacelike and timelike orthogonal?what is the mathematical proof

Ok got the point.thanks for simplifying the point!

But if we take the 2nd case still our assumption is correct for large value of q

But still we are left with the term e^-q^2/2

In the series solution of simple harmonic oscillator,why do we have a factor of 1/2 in the trial solution?