Recent content by loop quantum gravity

  1. L

    Stargazing Falcon 9 predicted lunar impact

    As the saying goes:"the Moon is not there, if nobody is looking..." :oldbiggrin:
  2. L

    Comp Sci A question on solution 6.1-2 from CLRS

    How to prove the following claim? that: $$m=\lfloor \log_2 n \rfloor= \lfloor \lg n \rfloor$$ from $$n=2m+k−1$$ ? Obviously we have $$m=log_2(n−k+1)$$ . ##k## is the number of leaves. My question has arisen from the solution here: https://walkccc.me/CLRS/Chap06/6.1/ of 6.1-2. Thanks in...
  3. L

    Graduate Is photon frequency intrinsic or observer-dependent?

    what's the definition of ##k^\mu## here? is it momentum up to constant hbar or something else? maybe a wave number?
  4. L

    Undergrad If gravity is emergent, how does this affect string theory and loop quantum gravity?

    why is it notoriously wrong? I mean there are several SUSY theories and I think not all of them were bogged down by LHC, were they? On another matter I gave a look at BFSS paper on M theory being suggested as a matrix theory, I think they tried to incoporate to M theory, RMT. As someone who took...
  5. L

    Undergrad If gravity is emergent, how does this affect string theory and loop quantum gravity?

    Thanks for the reference if only I had the time to read it all. (I have quite a lot of books in maths and physics to be read; so it takes a lot of time).
  6. L

    Undergrad If gravity is emergent, how does this affect string theory and loop quantum gravity?

    Does M theory and its companion F theory tell us if gravity is emergent or not? I guess they would say that some sort of vibrating strings lead to gravity's emergence; no I don't have referneces at the top of my head right I just remember stuff, and granted my memory is not that strong.
  7. L

    Undergrad If gravity is emergent, how does this affect string theory and loop quantum gravity?

    Thanks for clearing matters out. Well, as for being emergent or not it depends if we have an experiment that shows bijectively that emerges from something else. I read some say from entropy; In my UG lab classes we never calculated entropy directly. If we somehow can change the direction of...
  8. L

    Undergrad If gravity is emergent, how does this affect string theory and loop quantum gravity?

    What does it even mean that it's not fundamental force; if we recall that gravity field is exactly as acceleration field (inertial mass=gravitational mass). For a full quantum theory of gravity you must have the graviton with spin 2; it makes you wonder if gravity makes masses to gravitate then...
  9. L

    Graduate Duality between Feynman graphs

    There's a definition of a dual graph to another graph, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_graph Now QFT at least the perturbative one is plagued with Feynman graphs, so obviously one can ask a trivial does the dual of a specific Feynman graph have a physical significance or physical...
  10. L

    Graduate Using the Homotopy Analysis method in QG and BSM for solving nasty DEs

    I am wondering how common is it for people from BSM to use this method to solve nonlinear pdes that arise in their work?
  11. L

    Undergrad Solving the chess game (quantum computer wise)

    That's a weak solution. As you know with mathematical riddles one needs to practice quite a lot and then perhaps gain intuition for the game. I am not really good in playing in chess, but as I play in PS5 NHL and other games in the most difficult level eventually I'll find how to solve the...
  12. L

    Undergrad "The wavefunction never collapses"

    Eventually both QP and GR are not the end of the story of physics. And we are bound to have a new theory that it's not QP and not GR, only at a suitable limits it behaves like them. I guess it would be called semiclassical gravity. One neads to synthsize methods from Condensed matter physics...
  13. L

    Undergrad Solving the chess game (quantum computer wise)

    no, I understand it would be an enormous number and one needs to speedup the technology so that a computer would do the job (obviously), but evem then a human needs to check that there are no mistakes in the code. Eventually we'll solve chess game and we'll invent even harder games.... I wonder...
  14. L

    Undergrad Solving the chess game (quantum computer wise)

    Can you explain why is it 100 factorial? I know it's hard to count all possible outcomes; but it's no impossible. :cool: