Matterwave's latest activity
-
Matterwave reacted to tbp_Wallbreaker's post in the thread Graduate Do any Bell papers plot raw data for non-entangled controls? with
Skeptical.
Plugging p = 0 is just algebraic extrapolation—like inspecting an AI model weights at a theoretical limit rather than a zero-shot test... -
Matterwave reacted to danieltanfh95's post in the thread Graduate Why is Bell’s theorem still considered controversial? with
Sad.
BM is one example but more generally, I’m referring to parts of the Quantum Information community engaging with Bell foundations through... -
Matterwave replied to the thread Graduate Do any Bell papers plot raw data for non-entangled controls?.I don't understand this objection. If you plug in ##p=0## into equation 1 you get ##\rho_C=\frac{1}{2}(|o_1\rangle|o_2\rangle\langle...
-
Matterwave replied to the thread Graduate Do any Bell papers plot raw data for non-entangled controls?.Well I was responding to your general request, which seemed to me to be how to control for systematic errors and noise. If this single...
-
Matterwave replied to the thread Graduate Do any Bell papers plot raw data for non-entangled controls?.Have you already looked through papers and didn't find what you were looking for? It might be helpful to state which papers you already...
-
Matterwave replied to the thread Graduate Why is Bell’s theorem still considered controversial?.Which would be?
-
Matterwave reacted to zonde's post in the thread Graduate Do any Bell papers plot raw data for non-entangled controls? with Skeptical.
Experimentalists can't prove what you are asking for. Proving is for mathematicians. But there certainly are things that...
-
Matterwave reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread Graduate Why is Bell’s theorem still considered controversial? with
Haha.
Unlike Copenhagen/orthodox type interpretations, which function as "let's just hide ugly stuff behind vague words, so when someone... -
Matterwave replied to the thread Graduate Why is Bell’s theorem still considered controversial?.This is interesting. Sometimes one hears from the orthodox QM crowd that a lean towards a ##\psi##-epistemic reading avoids paradoxes...
-
Matterwave reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Graduate Why is Bell’s theorem still considered controversial? with
Like.
Does "wavefunction realism" imply a ##\psi##-ontic interpretation? In that case, there are interpretations consistent with this, such as... -
Matterwave replied to the thread High School Why light can travel at c?.Fair enough. Perhaps I was not as charitable with my language in my prior post (#23) as I should have been. Indeed, I quite like the...
-
Matterwave replied to the thread Graduate Why is Bell’s theorem still considered controversial?.I see some hedging with the (somewhat), but it seems your view is basically that of orthodox QM? It is called "orthodox" because it is...
-
Matterwave reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread High School Why light can travel at c? with Like.
But we also observe the homogeneity and isotropy of space. Those are experimental facts as well: that the same experiments done in labs...
-
Matterwave reacted to Demystifier's post in the thread Graduate Why is Bell’s theorem still considered controversial? with Like.
Let me answer your questions in the reverse order. 1. Bohmian mechanics (BM) makes the same measurable predictions as standard quantum...
-
Matterwave replied to the thread Graduate Why is Bell’s theorem still considered controversial?.Simply slapping a "classical" label on something doesn't make it false. Reichenbach's principle of common causes says that when two...