Matterwave's latest activity

Two things: 1. You need to be more careful with your algebra. The fourier integral is going to get you a ##\delta^3(\vec{k}+\vec{q})##...

Be careful suppressing the ##\vec{k}## arguments (inside ##a## and ##\epsilon##). They are important here.

0 is already special. It is the additive identity in the Complex, Real, Integer, Natural, etc. number systems. We use it a lot! So...

Could you clarify or elaborate what you are trying say? This is a true statement, I feel like I'm just missing your point. The Sun...

That’s like saying I’m a billionaire but I just happen to have zero billion dollars at the moment.

Thank you for the additional arguments and clarification! Yes, this is the way I meant it. Supervenience is not symmetric in general...

It that's true, isn't discussing the "subjective experience" more akin to debating philosophy or religion instead of science?

My background is medical imaging, specifically MRI. So, my comments are not about protecting physics. My comments are about recognizing...

This is now a definitional argument (which is fine, it's good to get our definitions sharp). But for me, such a definition requires more...

Ok, then write out what you actually get. One full term that has two ##a## in it for example. Then do BAC-CAB. After that you should...

I see you have a single sum over ##\sigma##. You might consider that a bit more. How did you get a single sum?

"Is a manifestation happening due to" is different from "is the same thing". So you are not "arguing exactly that" here.

hmm, I will go back and check. I am not sure which symmetry properties are helpful here, but I might be overlooking.

Check the symmetry properties of those terms relative to your domain of integration.

It will, but because energy is frame dependent the "gamma" ray will not be in the gamma energy range in this reference frame. It could...