Mike_bb's latest activity

Here's my graphical attempt to help you @Mike_bb . After a summary-and-diagram, there is a second diagram with an exercise for you to...

This is an incomplete sentence. You have named two events, so you have the subject of the sentence, but not the verb. Please use...

Let me visualize this. Reference frame A: Clock B: [0s] --> Frame A clock grid: [0s] [0s] [0s] [0s] [0s] [0s]...

More precise.

That means there is no contradiction, analog to what you wrote in posting #73:

With reference to which frame is the highlighted statement valid?

frame A

That's the point, [clock A = 100s] and [clock B = 80s]. I suggest following simultaneously events: With reference to frame B the events...

With reference to frame A the events [clock A = 100s] and [clock B = 80s] happen simultaneous to each other. With reference to frame B...

Yes, I agree with this, there is no contradiction. But why did you write about these events? I asked about that from frame B clock A...

The time-coordinate of an inertial frame is defined by a grid of synchronized clocks, which are all at rest with reference to this...

I provided example in post#69.

Well, see post #50: With reference to Observer B's rest-frame: Clock B first shows 80s (E2) and ##20s## later clock B shows 100s (E3)...

If from frame B clock A shows 100s then in frame A clock A shows 100s. What's wrong?

This is nice example. Thanks! But for our example you wrote that: From frame B: clock B shows 100s(E3), clock A shows 80s. Then clock...