Morbert's latest activity

The transition maps across division events will prevent jumping.

We can derive the subsystem transition map from the larger unistochastic system a la section 3.7 in Barandes's paper. We can say it...

Both transition maps are nomologically valid for their purposes, and while the universe contains subsystems, this does not mean the...

In Barandes's formalism, interference terms in a quantum state encode the indivisibility of a stochastic process. From his...

The collapse postulate is motivated by the fact that, for all practical purposes, the statistics of a quantum system + pointer degrees...

@Sambuco your case 2 is the relevant one. But The transition matrix nearly exactly reflects the dynamics of the particle + apparatus...

It would only be equivalent to the collapse postulate if it was claimed that the transition matrix ##p(z_i\omega_i, t | z_j\omega_j,t')...

Barandes's formalism is an effective collapse formalism, which means the transition matrix ##\Gamma(t\leftarrow 0) = \Gamma(t\leftarrow...

The near exactness of divisibility, analogous to the near exactness of decoherence, means that for a toy system I described previously...

For a subsystem constantly interacting with its environment, the stochastic dynamics will be divisible. They can be defined in terms of...

This timestamp might be of interest, where he discusses dynamics of subsystems vs the entire universe.

See section 3.7 here. Transition maps are the entirety of dynamics in this formalism, and system-environment dynamics (equation 44) give...

It's quite simple: Transition probabilities, not standalone probabilities, make up the nomological content of the reformulation. No...

It is the case in Barandes's formalism. Consider for example a simple model of the Stern-Gerlach Experiment with initial particle...

At the timestamp, Barandes remarks on the distinction between standalone probabilities and transition probabilities, the latter of which...