Morbert's latest activity

So what is meant by "The non-Markovianity in Barandes' correspondence comes from projecting this onto particle-configuration variables"?

Are you saying a stochastic process modeled with field configurations would be Markovian?

If quantum mechanics describes me (a subsystem heavily coupled to my environment) as evolving according to a quantum channel...

This is too close to ground we've covered in other threads. Not sure there's value in rehashing it.

Equation (5) from the paper: ##p(t) = \Gamma(t\leftarrow t_0)p(t_0)##. Given some initial distribution ##p(t_0)##, the dynamics...

And other people say an indivisible stochastic process is a stochastic process because it concerns a system modeled with a configuration...

The dictionary terms give you the elements of the transition matrix, which plays the role of dynamics in an indivisible stochastic...

I'll keep my responses grounded in literature. Specifically the recent Calvo preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18720 In the standard...

The correspondence is to a theory of an indivisible stochastic process. An indivisible stochastic process is an equivalence class of...

@iste Your last post was hard to follow. All I can gather is you seem to be insisting theories of stochastic processes must include...

No faith is involved. The correspondence is now the topic of multiple papers. It's there plain as day. If people don't think a quantum...

I would rather say that to me, that having "probability of histories" out of the way is not peculiar, it is a good sign! Not by a remote...

Γ indeed encodes the dynamics of the theory. It just doesn't select a unique probability measure on the space of trajectories. It's easy...

Would you agree that these are the same probabilities he talks about in 2.2 In his correspondence paper where he says "In particular...

What I was hoping for was these towers of probabilities giving rise to inaccessible probabilities for trajectories that are nevertheless...