Morbert's latest activity

Yes, the configuration space in the papers is the space of spatial arrangements. I think this is the same as in Bohmian mechanics but I...

David Wallace, an established many-worlds champion, draws heavily from the decoherent histories formalism to sketch the notion of a...

Unless I am misunderstanding, take some configuration ##i##: ##p_i(t) = \sum_j \Gamma_{ij}(t\leftarrow t_0)p_j(t_0)##. This is equation...

Griffiths CH is the most explicitly realist version of CH among the developers of the formalism. His writings on it are also the most...

Projection to any configuration space produces the non-Markovianity, particles or fields. Barandes uses particle configurations, so I...

So what is meant by "The non-Markovianity in Barandes' correspondence comes from projecting this onto particle-configuration variables"?

Are you saying a stochastic process modeled with field configurations would be Markovian?

If quantum mechanics describes me (a subsystem heavily coupled to my environment) as evolving according to a quantum channel...

This is too close to ground we've covered in other threads. Not sure there's value in rehashing it.

Equation (5) from the paper: ##p(t) = \Gamma(t\leftarrow t_0)p(t_0)##. Given some initial distribution ##p(t_0)##, the dynamics...

And other people say an indivisible stochastic process is a stochastic process because it concerns a system modeled with a configuration...

The dictionary terms give you the elements of the transition matrix, which plays the role of dynamics in an indivisible stochastic...

I'll keep my responses grounded in literature. Specifically the recent Calvo preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.18720 In the standard...

The correspondence is to a theory of an indivisible stochastic process. An indivisible stochastic process is an equivalence class of...

@iste Your last post was hard to follow. All I can gather is you seem to be insisting theories of stochastic processes must include...