Recent content by NewDescartes

By the way thanks for everything. I enjoy this immensely, even debates.

So the gravitational constant is approx. 6.67428 * 10^11 Newtons??

I was wondering where the Gravitational Constant comes from. As far as I know it has been measured with a tension line and weights. I also understand that Newton uses it his gravitational formula, but he didn't measure it. Did he just guess the number? Also is G the proportionality or...

If you are interested I'll share my logic with you. I don't want to come off as promoting a crackpot theory and get banned. I know how closed minded physics is and am struggling to convince Science and Nature to publish my work. The problem is I am more of a philosopher than a physicist. I...

Yeah I caught that, but I understood what you meant. Yes, objects moving away from you would be red shifted at close to C, to the point of non visibility. This explain's "[URL paradox[/URL]. All I am arguing is that if matter travels at velocity C, it is a black hole. Sure the original...

I completely agree with everything you say here. You guys are more familiar with the subject, so perhaps I should listen more, but there is a huge hole in physics and this subject is at the core of it. I only wish to debate a little to see why present day physics comes to irrational decisions...

The Rindler space-time coordinate system is confusing, and doesn't translate from mathematical jargon to English very well. How does an infinite amount of energy moving at the speed of light not create a black hole? Numbers and coordinates prevent it? That isn't very convincing.

LOL. Physics is philosophy. Getting back to the core of the subject, you said that an object traveling @ C will not become a black hole. Why? This is an apparently obvious truth to me, and I would like to know why mainstream physics doesn't believe this to be true.

Lol, your right. I don't need to get to carried away, and tell you my theory for gravity. Whew. That was a close one.

The V<A just meant so long as my acceleration was bringing me closer the object I was chasing. Thats all, I guess it made no sense. My bad.

LOL. No you just believe the standard thinking definition of black hole. Let me give you a hint, don't think like the herd. An object moving at @ C most definitely is not viewable from any reference frame outside of that object, a black hole. Light only is emitted from the .999999% speed of...

It is highly red shifted @ .999999% C. It flat lines @ C. We never catch an object moving @ C, nor can our probing light rays.

It is clear you can't do philosophy.

There are no observers in a black hole, if there is, we can never know, unless the black hole lowers its gravity, or slows down. I think it is ironic you are trying to explain relativity to me, when you don't understand relativity. Earlier you quoted "For example, there is some frame...

Let me Elucidate on MASSIVE REDSHIFT. When the object in motion approaches light speed, the Earth becomes invisible.