‘It has been supposed that empty space has no physical properties but only geometrical properties. No such empty space without physical properties has ever been observed, and the assumption that it can exist is without justification. It is convenient to ignore the physical properties of space...
Electronics World, October 2004, Vol. 110, No. 1822:
Page 55 summary of gravity as per http://nigelcook0.tripod.com/
The outward motion of matter in the big bang causes an opposite motion of the fabric of the continuum of space, flowing around fundamental particles to fill in the vacated...
Thank you for your friendly words, I do not believe that you are setting out to be sarcastic, although if you read Galileo you find various telling remarks:
1. "In matters of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a sole individual."
2. Galileo to Kepler...
John Horgan wrote a brilliant book a few years, "The End of Science". He claimed that the big Popperian speculative theories are almost confirmed (without any evidence, because unless you confirm them, you have no earthly way of even knowing for sure that they are correct - let alone nearly...
Just to let everyone know, I'm tired of abuse from ill informed ignorant people who insist on trying to discredit other people's work without even studying it. When shown to be incorrect, these people return with abuse. This site is useless for scientific debate, since whenever a fact is...
On my internet site for the past year there is this quotation:
Light aside:
‘[Einstein’s] final manuscript was prepared and sent to the Physical Review. It was returned to him accompanied by a lengthy referee report in which clarifications were requested. Einstein was enraged and wrote to...
From Nature Editor Dr Philip Campbell’s 25 November 1996 letter to NC: ‘… we are not able to offer to publish… we have not communicated the contents of your paper to any person outside this office.’
From Galileo’s letter to Kepler: ‘Here, at Padua, is the principal professor of philosophy...
I've tried to change the title of this thread to the following:
Proof that gravity constant G = (3/4)(H^2)/[4(pi)(density)e^3]
This doesn't work so please go to the new thread with that title. Thanks, Nigel
More propaganda! You are now going in for disgusting Dr Goebbels style stuff.
PLEASE DO NOT INSULT YOURSELF BY PRETENDING NOT TO HAVE READ MY REPLY ABOVE ABOUT PUBLICATION IN ELECTRONICS WORLD.
1. You claim that it should be published in a scientific journal, not Electronics World.
2...
No:
4 page original paper containing 1.5 page proof discussed on this forum last year (it ended up being moved to the archives after several thousand hits):
‘Electronic Universe’ article (Electronics World, Vol. 109, No. 1804) proves G = 3(H^2)/(4 pi ρ). [Ref...
It is a proof of the mechanism of gravity. It does not "just relate" anything. It proves a mechanism using observed facts, not fairies. The observed facts include the expansion (Hubble constant).
This shows that you have zero understanding of anything except outrageous political-type...
How do you suggest I deal with Dr Strangelove, then, wise guy:
From Nature Editor Dr Philip Campbell’s 25 November 1996 letter to NC: ‘… we are not able to offer to publish… we have not communicated the contents of your paper to any person outside this office.’
From Nature Physical...