Recent content by nouveau_riche

I know that in the process of fusion in Stars, the hydrogen fuses into helium and so on until Iron is formed. The fusion stops after the formation of Iron and the graviatational force wins to take over the star evolution. Then how do we account for the elements which are havier than Iron?

okay i will explain it to you. consider i am new to probability, i started to play with dice in order to predict how likely do i get 2 if i repeat my experiment. i performed it many times and see that the ratio of favorable outcome to total comes 1/6 but i would still not be sure if i get 2 in...

the 50-50 probability is also a result of repeated experimentation.The probability of an outcome taken to be as the ratio of favorable outcome to total outcome. If you haven't played with dice enough, you can't say about the probabilistic behavior of a particular number on it. In the similar...

then what is the role of collapsing wave function, because i don't see it in your answer

my point is that when Schrödinger itself would have looked at the quantum particle, he must have seen the collapsed wavefunction but not the Schrödinger wavefunction. In the experimental setup, how could he come to probabilistic evolution of particle knowing that it is the collapsed, unity...

I am new to quantum mechanics and trying to combine the pieces. If I am looking into the quartum world, first I prepare a mechanism with which i can bring the properties and behavior of the particles i.e. an experiment to study them, but the information i emphasize to look on in the experiment...

but observation can differ from measurement, in case observation ou collapse the wavefunction, doesn't that violate uncertainity principle. i have also read that a particle is found to be at a place when looked for it,everytime then how do we know it has probabilities for various regions.

i was going through the quantum mechanics book by griffith and on the very first chapter i read that the wavefunction of the quantum particle collapse on measurement. and if the interval between the succesive measurement is shorter the particle will be found at the very same location. the...

hi, i m new to particle physics why is it that we cannot subdivide the leptons but we can do divide protons(we speak of quarks) knowing the fact that it is much difficult to break protons ?

could you please show me what you said, with an example

what i meant to say was that if a fermion is changing into a boson that is a carrier of force, the field generating fermion has itself transformed into the carrier under some conditions, this could help to figure the fermion-boson relationship.

i think it is possible but the situation has to be ideal to make that happen but if you like to choose sheet over the point charge the prediction have altered as i said

i haven't answer the question yet but i need the answer before i can answer else you will be standing upright with your point

i cannot give you imagination just imagine the situation if the observer on train always find that there is no component of electric field of charge which is perpendicular to the area vector.

is it necessary that the bosons will always play the role of force carrier?