Recent content by only1universe

The amount of energy needed is the minimum needed assuming that it is applied in the most advantageous way, with none of it being lost as heat. All burying it does is decrease the losses slightly, it cannot magnify the energy's effect. (and considering that the deepest hole ever drilled is...

I think exclusion at the very worst gives a "god" little to do. (per examples stated above- twiddle his thumbs inside black holes or grand design a universe he will never interact with.) Most faiths are destroyed by this logic. Could a "god" exist? Most certainly, but I can think of exactly 0...

I think a planet can explode without breaking its gravitational binding energy, it would just explode then get pulled back together. Also you ignore that burying them drastically alters the behavior of the energy, just like a tap can cleave a diamond- even though a diamond as measured in...

The distinction is only made due to the arrogance of humanity. I say just as a beaver naturally builds a dam, or a vulture naturally eats dead stuff- humanity is a natural biological organism doing as it does. The distinction between what is natural does become a debate over what would be...

I'm struggling to see the application of basically lubricating an old experiment.

Well if having no mass did effect the pressure, I'd have to say that masses information had been observed by the negative vacuum pressure. Which leads me of course to wonder if negative vacuum pressure can induce energy and mass again. I'm dead certain this universe is a cycle, I'm still...

Manmade would be natural means imo, but i get what your saying.

Mass gone, matter's ability to take up 3 dimensions leaves a negative vacuum pressure in its absence.

Whats the minimum that would be required for there to be a negative vacuum pressure? Could there be a negative pressure simply due to the absence of matter once all else is removed?

They're showing you the same wave at 2 different times.

I'm sure their must be enough energy to turn it all into nuclear weapons, explode them all in the Earth's core, and blow us to smithereens. I like that word. Anyway, I believe a planet can explode if it has humans dedicated fully to building nuclear bombs, then burying at the most effective...

Could a vacuum act as an observer? It seems the fact that it can and does interact with particles and/or vacuum pressure fluctuation would be re-iterating information.

Doesn't this fundamentally change a coordinate of matter? And if not then how did matter manage to stay in the same place? I view this as a propellant- even if it is only conceptual, Matter did in-fact move. A positron doesn't demonstrate this ability? Would a vacuum not be a universe...

The metric system becomes the first step in physics problems, but is not necessary in most other way science fields. Still, all lab equipment is marked in metric. The conversions are taught, and the metric system is learned sometime around the 5th grade. "katy has diahreea but don't call mom."...

So then the next question is, will the universe ever decay to this state?