PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK reacted to jedishrfu's post in the thread B A Time Crystal Visible to the Human Eye with
Informative.
https://interestingengineering.com/science/worlds-first-time-crystal-visible-human-eye -
PeroK reacted to Nugatory's post in the thread I Quantum Entanglement and Synchronization with
Like.
No. There is no way of distinguishing a so-called collapsed state from an uncollapsed state (the “so-called” is there because even... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Quantum Entanglement and Synchronization.I guess your idea is to measure A and simultaneously B "changes state", which is instantly observed by clock B. That misunderstands...
-
PeroK replied to the thread I Quantum Entanglement and Synchronization.The mechanism described there is not what you propose in your original post.
-
Part of the problem is that there are two common systems which many (most) conflate. Either imply the uncertainty from the number of...
-
When I was a practicing EE, none of this ever made sense to me. These problems rarely mention the probability distribution of the data...
-
My article cites the exact wording (Latin) and its English translation: “Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos...
-
"I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too small to contain."
-
PeroK replied to the thread Errors and significant figures.As I said, my instinct is that the true area must lie within the given range. In this case, area could be 20.8, which is not ## 19\pm...
-
PeroK replied to the thread Errors and significant figures.It's not a question of being precise. It's a question of the area definitely lying within the range given.
-
PeroK replied to the thread Errors and significant figures.PS 20.5 is not an upper limit for the area. It would have to be ##19 \pm 2##, assuming the error must be symmetric.
-
PeroK replied to the thread Errors and significant figures.My mathematical instinct is satisfied by ##19.4 \pm 1.5##. In this case, reducing the answer to ##19## plus or minus whatever doesn't...
-
PeroK replied to the thread Errors and significant figures.I'm not sure I know the expected answer, but I'd make the following observation. With that data, the area is between 17.92 and 20.88...
-
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2...
-
Hello everyone, I'm Cosmo. I'm an 18 years old student majoring in physics. I found this forum cause I was searching on Google if it's...