PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK replied to the thread RIP Robert Redford (89).That was one of the great Oscar travesties. Ordinary People over The Elephant Man and Raging Bull?! Best director and best picture?! -
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about discussions around quantum interpretations.I'm back in London, so I'll read your paper today. I'm not convinced that a coin is a good analogy for a quantum system, like a spin... -
PeroK reacted to Herman Trivilino's post in the thread I Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay with
Like.
I would love to see that if you can dig it up. -
PeroK reacted to Ibix's post in the thread I What Are the Limits of the Universe According to Cosmologists? with
Like.
It might turn out to have a non-zero curvature. But if it truly has a zero curvature we will never be able to confirm that it is not... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay.A lot of what passes for QM in non-specialist courses is a messy hybrid of QM and classical thinking, IMHO. If I could explain why... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay.I found a video of an Indian physics professor exploding this myth for his students. He knew they would all have learned the "old"... -
PeroK reacted to Herman Trivilino's post in the thread I Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay with
Like.
The position-momentum uncertainty principle is alive and well. I don't know the history, but certainly one still sees the erroneous... -
PeroK reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread I Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay with
Like.
I note you say (classical). Those textbooks are not focused on QM; they might cover it, but they're not primarily QM textbooks. Which... -
PeroK replied to the thread I What Are the Limits of the Universe According to Cosmologists?.The NG article is not worth reading. According to Introduction to Modern Cosmology by Liddle: The Big Bang model is reliable back to... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Energy*time uncertainty for particle decay.PS my Internet is down. I think I posted a quotation from Griffiths on this recently if you can find it.