PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK reacted to hokhani's post in the thread I Angular Momentum Vector and Its Magnitude with
Like.
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Angular Momentum Vector and Its Magnitude.Well, exactly! There is no realistic configuration that satisfies the requirements. I'm suprised this example isn't shown more often... -
PeroK reacted to sophiecentaur's post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Like.
Logically you could argue that you are correct but does your approach actually help understanding or discussion. It often makes things... -
PeroK replied to the thread A How to fix Relativistic QM so it's consistent?.I fail to see how RQM has any bearing on this. What you've written makes no sense to me, I'm sorry to say. -
PeroK replied to the thread A How to fix Relativistic QM so it's consistent?.Particles and anti-particles are well-established in the Standard Model. What are you trying to say? -
PeroK reacted to Esim Can's post in the thread A How to fix Relativistic QM so it's consistent? with
Skeptical.
If a negative energy appears somewhere, it is always an indication of a direction problem, or in other words a geometric problem, which... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Question about special relativity and magnetism.Why isn't one video enough? Maybe two at most. There are an equal number of positive and negative charges in the wire to start with... -
PeroK replied to the thread New Member :).GR is ambitious, indeed. How it's going? -
PeroK replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.That's nearer to what I would say. But, if someone wants to say pushing a wall and the wall pushing back is cause and effect, then I'm... -
PeroK reacted to jbriggs444's post in the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology? with
Agree.
Correlation is not the same as causation. I would say that it is possible for some state of affairs to "cause" a Newton's third law... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.I'm not convinced that cause and effect implies a temporal ordering. Google AI, for what it's worth. is happy with the idea that cause... -
PeroK reacted to mathwonk's post in the thread Foundations A rigorous approach to learn Mathematics with
Like.
Please forgive me for reminding you that it is much easier to make a list than it is to read profitably through that list. In my... -
PeroK replied to the thread I Conservation of angular momentum in the iceskater example.If a chunk falls off your car, the rest of the car does not necessarily speed up. -
PeroK replied to the thread I Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?.Cause and effect, if it has any meaning at all, is more general than Newton's third law. It's part of a wider understanding of how one...