PeroK's latest activity

An antiproton can't annihilate itself with a positron. They are not each other's antiparticle. An antiproton can "capture" a positron to...

Generally annhiliation is between a particle and its antiparticle. The interaction between an antiproton and a positron would be...

You may also find useful the PDG Review of Particle Physics: https://pdg.lbl.gov/2025/html/computer_read.html In particular Section 14...

In general an expected value does not itself need to be one of the possible values. For example, the expected value of a roll of a...

Is this useful? https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0510213

I'm not convinced by this. Introductory books on Abstract Algebra, Number Theory and Real Analysis etc. would cover a lot of general...

Actually not. Moreover in most cases it is counterproductive.

Given the method, I think you should include the potential energy due to gravity (though you should've had ##-mgx##). It feels a bit...

Coulomb's law breaks down for high-energy scattering. QED predicts this and presents Coulomb's law as a low-energy approximation...

It is taken into account. See figure 2.5.4 and the subsequent calculations. But, it cancels out of the final equation for SHM. Once...

This doesn't take into account that the equilibrium position depends on gravity. See the analysis I linked to.

Have you ever studied a mass oscillating vertically on a spring? It might be easier to look at that problem first and figure out why...

Why not add GPE to the analysis and see what equations you get?

Here is an explanantion of why the quantum eraser does not imply retrocausality:

How does this formula compare to the well-verified results from QED? In particular, where does Planck's constant ##h## enter it?