PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK reacted to weirdoguy's post in the thread New person here, where do I post my own personal hypothesis? with
Like.
Why are you wasting your time doing this instead of just learning what is already known? -
PeroK replied to the thread What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom?.PS and electromagetic radiation can produce an electron-positron pair. See, for example... -
PeroK replied to the thread What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom?.In classical physics, there is a distinction between charged particles and electromagnetic fields. Moreover, the mass of a closed... -
PeroK reacted to mfb's post in the thread New person here, where do I post my own personal hypothesis? with
Agree.
No website that accepts this is worth a recommendation. You are not the first who thinks they can revolutionize physics based on some... -
PeroK reacted to rcgldr's post in the thread Why have the number of questions declined over recent years? with
Informative.
It's not just at Phsyics Forums, as for example, this graph of the monthly question rate at stack overflow: -
PeroK reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with
Like.
Thanks for the reference @martinbn! I've been reading a bit about all this and I'd like to add something that I think is interesting... -
PeroK reacted to timmdeeg's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with
Like.
Thanks for clarifying, this I've been missing even though I'm watching chess games online sometimes. -
PeroK reacted to martinbn's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with
Informative.
Here is a quote from Rovelli. Taken from here https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-relational/ To me this is clear. The existence of... -
PeroK replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.Imagine that we were living in a simulation. Everything would look the same, but there would be no force of gravity, as such. A... -
PeroK reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with
Like.
In fact, Rovelli developed the relational interpretation inspired by his work in loop quantum gravity. He discusses this in section 4(c)... -
PeroK replied to the thread High School Two interesting number theory tricks.I did this trick once on a climber. I was browsing through his climbing guide book and told him I had memorised all the climbs. All I... -
PeroK replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.Note that the Rovelli paper above does not consider the question of the existence of an electron, as we have been discussing it here... -
PeroK reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with
Informative.
Hi @PeroK! Your objections relate to certain metaphysical assumptions that you take for granted, but which RQM rejects. First, I would... -
PeroK replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.Let's take the Stern-Gerlach experiment. There is a source of silver atoms. Those atoms pass through an inhomogeneous magnetic field...