PeroK's latest activity
-
PeroK reacted to renormalize's post in the thread What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom? with
Like.
Yes, I definitely agree with that statement, since what we now called the "Schwinger effect"... -
PeroK reacted to Borek's post in the thread Why have the number of questions declined over recent years? with
Sad.
And how do you judge, if the answer is beyond your knowledge? -
PeroK reacted to Killtech's post in the thread Why have the number of questions declined over recent years? with Like.
this is an example for a misunderstanding an AI wouldn't do. a discussion is broader then a single question and exploring any topic...
-
PeroK reacted to Lord Jestocost's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with
Informative.
Scientific Realism “In the philosophy of science, this is the doctrine that we can and should accept well-established scientific... -
PeroK reacted to Borek's post in the thread Why have the number of questions declined over recent years? with Like.
Several processes - one is that at some point "all questions were already answered", quite often it was enough to google for problem to...
-
PeroK reacted to weirdoguy's post in the thread New person here, where do I post my own personal hypothesis? with Like.
Why are you wasting your time doing this instead of just learning what is already known?
-
PeroK replied to the thread What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom?.PS and electromagetic radiation can produce an electron-positron pair. See, for example...
-
PeroK replied to the thread What type of energy is actually stored inside an atom?.In classical physics, there is a distinction between charged particles and electromagnetic fields. Moreover, the mass of a closed...
-
PeroK reacted to mfb's post in the thread New person here, where do I post my own personal hypothesis? with
Agree.
No website that accepts this is worth a recommendation. You are not the first who thinks they can revolutionize physics based on some... -
PeroK reacted to rcgldr's post in the thread Why have the number of questions declined over recent years? with Informative.
It's not just at Phsyics Forums, as for example, this graph of the monthly question rate at stack overflow:
-
PeroK reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Thanks for the reference @martinbn! I've been reading a bit about all this and I'd like to add something that I think is interesting...
-
PeroK reacted to timmdeeg's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
Thanks for clarifying, this I've been missing even though I'm watching chess games online sometimes.
-
PeroK reacted to martinbn's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Informative.
Here is a quote from Rovelli. Taken from here https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-relational/ To me this is clear. The existence of...
-
PeroK replied to the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics.Imagine that we were living in a simulation. Everything would look the same, but there would be no force of gravity, as such. A...
-
PeroK reacted to Sambuco's post in the thread Undergrad One does not “prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics with Like.
In fact, Rovelli developed the relational interpretation inspired by his work in loop quantum gravity. He discusses this in section 4(c)...