PeterDonis's latest activity

I don't think that plays any role in BM.

Yes, that's true, but the effective wave function, as your slides note, is what determines future trajectories, so that's the one that's...

The wave function that describes the quantum system being modeled. That would be particles A and B (and C and D in the entanglement...

From the latest DESI data release papers, the w0waCDM model fits the data best. I found it enlightening to look at the H(a) equation...

I'm not sure I agree. The velocity change is due to the effective collapse of the wave function because of the measurement of A, which...

But the effect of A's measurement result on B's wave function does not cease, because of the effective collapse when A is measured, as...

Before we can even talk about the other cases you mention, we first have to be clear about the simplest case, where A and B both exist...

No, that's not what we have agreed to. See my post #84 just now, which "crossed in the mail" with yours, so to speak.

No, BM does not say that. BM says that the wave function changes instantaneously and nonlocally because of the "effective collapse"...

What (effectively) collapses is not B's "spin component", it's the wave function. That contains information about all spin components...

This kind of reasoning implicitly assumes that the wave function is the state of the particle. As I emphasized again in post #77 just...

What I quoted from my post #67 in my post #76 just now should answer this. But to unpack it once more: The "effective collapse" induced...

Yes. Now compare with what I said in post #67: This is what @Demystifier meant when he said "of course". Then I gave more details to...

Norsen's NO is correct. See my post #67 (and my posts #61 and #62 that it refers to). If you mean anything else in the universe other...

I don't think you've misrepresented Norsen. I'm having difficulty understanding why you seem to think @Demystifier (and possibly I)...