This is the profile for member PeterDonis. This page shows details about PeterDonis like postings stats, blog posts, latest posts, trophies won and interests. If you want to follow or message this user you must register an account.
PeterDonis
Reaction score
22,247

Profile posts Latest activity Postings Articles About Post areas Trophies

  • I am perplexed at the cognitive dissonance you have when dealing in matters of clarification. You closed a thread suggesting that I was not attempting to educate myself further in maths which is exactly what I was trying to do. It is no wonder I cannot learn more mathematics if the people I ask for clarification and help have a similar disposition to you.
    • Like
    • Skeptical
    Likes weirdoguy, Hillbillychemist and THAUROS
    DaveC426913
    DaveC426913
    Actually, what he said was "...personal speculation is off limits here."

    PF maintains a standard of content based on the existing physical standard models and evidence for them.

    It would be paradoxical to ask for 'clarification' on models that are imaginary, I think you'll agree.
    N
    Thanks for moving my thread! I am so overcome with the excitement of ideas I didn't care to appreciate or respect the order in how to express it, and that was rude of me, so I apologize for that.
    T
    THAUROS
    Sorry to intrude, but I have been victim of arrogant attitude on this platform too. I signed up to learn more and I found myself being mistreated and had two comments reported as spam. They were then deleted by admin. But, I have avoided most direct interaction since.
    • Skeptical
    Likes weirdoguy
    You've left again. You've asked the question and didn't wait for the answer. This is the answer (part 2/2):
    I don't care "What does QM predict for such statistical results?" or "How does this hypothesis arise from the math of QM? (Hint: it doesn't.)" because, as you said, it doesn't predict it. QM tells nothing about it. The only way to know is the experiment. I can tell that you were waiting for me to use a lousy expression. Bravo.
    • Skeptical
    Likes weirdoguy
    You've left again. You've asked the question and didn't wait for the answer. This is the answer (part 1/2):
    This is the uncertainty value:##Δt=(l_2−l_1)/c##
    This is the uncertainty range:##<−Δt;+Δt>##
    This is the result range:##<t−Δt;t+Δt>##
    That was Rude. I read the articles: I want an electronic device that could be used in a non lab setting. The Lamb Shift is difficult to measure even in the lab. The Casimir Effect is bulk net effect. Since the SET is dealing with single electrons maybe it could be influenced by single QVFs and that this influence could be measured by appropriate amplification. If there is no such thing as QVFs then ok.
    I do not appreciate you closing my thread before I could respond. "Entitlement to belief" was a courtesy to one who abandon the field rather than answering my response.

    The criterion for closing a thread should not be that one is questioning a widely held position. The response assumed that the definition of "spin" as intrinsic angular momentum had been abandoned without notice by Bell in his proof.
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed
    oops meant 185
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed
    trying to help with MCAS see #158 ? oops 185
    Gold Member
    May I ask for a different resolution for my thread "Schrödinger's cat: what's the state?" Instead of locking the thread, please could we delete the comments of mine and yours that led to you locking it? I can agree that my comments there are too much in my own research line, but the question itself seems open to discussion within conventional norms.
    Gold Member
    Peter, if it is I who caused the "Does the "space twin" benefit from length contraction?" to be closed, please discipline me and allow others to post if they wish. My apologies. Thanks, Wes
    Gold Member
    Dearly Missed
    Peter,can you tell me why my thread Time and the universe was closed
    cheers,
    I appreciate the recent posts on the thread explaining why I was wrong instead of just saying I was.
    • Like
    Likes Olbaz, Sisoeff, timmdeeg and 3 others
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top