PeterDonis's latest activity

Again, you are assuming this is the case. I am saying I think that assumption is not justified. But you are still claiming they are...

But this reasoning doesn't work for the case @DrChinese is really concerned about, where A and D are measured before the swap operation...

For reference for other readers, the new thread by @DrChinese is here...

A new thread has been started by @Demystifier on the topic of how BM accounts for entanglement swapping experiments. The new thread is...

As a note for future readers of the thread: BM violates Bell's locality assumption, so it does not have to violate counterfactual...

Adding more doesn't change what I said. See below. Yes, it is. The phrase "whether their two photons are entangled" only makes sense...

Since it explicitly used the word "challenge", you should not be surprised that readers interpret it that way.

Note that this claim is interpretation dependent: it presupposes an interpretation where the wave function is the state of the system...

Please be aware that according to the rules of this subforum, claims that a particular interpretation of QM is wrong (or right, for that...

So for the entire ensemble, there will be no Bell inequality violations. Ok. If we assume zero orbital angular momentum in the center...

@PeterDonis in the closed thread you ask me about a reference for the claim that the quantum potential is not considered fundamental in...

What are you basing this on? Are you assuming that the "bunch of electron-positron pairs" was created by a process that ensures that...

Your reason is basically that you want to measure the magnitude of magnetic moments. But there are much simpler ways of measuring the...