pines-demon's latest activity

I can’t because I do not have any clear example of this kind of non-Markovian dynamics in other contexts.

A mathematical correspondence is not an interpretation. Is a Wick rotation an interpretation? for me Barandes vision is missing a toy...

This is a key point! In one of his many talks, Barandes said that, in his formulation, the typical spatial non-locality that arises from...

Yes. The question is whether the Bell sense actually captures the notion of nonlocal influence if dynamics are non-Markovian. From "La...

This is the part were I remain skeptic, the dynamics remains nonlocal in the Bell sense but local in Barandes sense. We are repeating...

Where does he claim that?

Personally, and for the time being, I would characterize Barandés' interpretation as a middle ground between objective collapse and the...

But he doesn't give any new "conception of causality" to replace the classical one. Perhaps he thinks that isn't required. But that...

As you say, he is saying that there is nothing "spooky" (I disagree). He is trying to focus the conversation on his redefinition of...

Again showing this is a play on words and definitions and not really explaining anything.

Sure but we already know quantum mechanics, in any of its interpretation does not violate non-signaling so if by causal locality he...

In other words, violations of the Bell inequalities don't require "communication" between the systems according to his definition. Which...

In this sentence the heavy lifting is being done by stochastic dynamics. This has nothing to do with what I said.

Skimming through it, it seems that again he throws away Bell's local causality, uses his new "causal locality" and everything is...

New Barandes preprint on "The CHSH Game, Tsirelson's Bound, and Causal Locality" arXiv:2512.18105v1