Recent content by Piscuit

That's what I thought, thank you.

Is it true that photons have no mass/weight? Please clarify this, I may be misinformed.

Okay, I BELIEVE that I just read that the shapes of these electrons orbit will be altered slightly because of the electromagnetic forces between them. Is this because electrons are negative, and thusly they want to be farther away from each other and may be forced to change the orbital shape...

I don't use any source other than my memories of my childhood, and simple logic for each term. Though I'm not sure you were talking to me.

Lots of thermal energy/heat that this has to withstand?

I do BELIEVE carbon fiber is conductive. I wonder, is there a lot of heat that this has to withstand? I also wonder if kevlar is conductive, because it is quite a strong material.

My personal theory happens to be that our universe has always existed, simply in another dimension, and that the big bang was actually the opening of a wormhole in which all life from that other dimension was extinguished from the pressure of said wormhole. This would explain why there is...

I think that this coincides nicely with Mayan religion, about how the universe restarts, and every time beings get more complex. (they predicted the next apocalypse and universe restart in the year 2012) They also believe that at some point we will be such complex beings that telepathy will be...

You could use an aluminum covered with zinc plating bar, (fully non-conductive.) Commonly used for engine testing on turbo fan systems. Though I have heard that it may be expensive.

I read it, (it is now 3 years later) and I understand basically what you mean. Light particles can travel all possible paths from point A, to point B. So trying to measure the distance that photon actually travels is impossible to measure. Because that light particle is bouncing EVERYWHERE.

So there is argument that the speed of light is an average? I know that light has different wavelengths and thus appears to us as color. Please give a summary of aforementioned article, it looks like it would take 3 years to read.

Yeah, I can see what you mean.

No, its not just you.

Science itself evolves, hm, I never thought about it quite like that before; but I can see what you mean.

I can see now why new experiments won't always coincide with previous results.