Recent content by polarstarus

It's actually kind of hard to tell from this chart, but it sort of looks like t-disk corresponds to an inflection point on the bold continuous line,(0.27,0.73), and t-halo to the light continuous line, (0.1,0.9). He says that the bold line is the best-fit for the data. In any event an...

Question on Lineweaver's Chart Is there a reason why t-halo and t-disk seem to coincide with inflection points?

I like her Dr. Who page. One of the problems is this- Lambda isn't fixed, the accelration is decreasing in magnitude. The expansion rate will continue to increase but at an ever decreasing rate. The acceleration was much higher in the early universe and goes to zero as the age goes to infinity.

Sorry. meteor is correct. >maybe that is the belief, but not the fact

A: Any data pointing to larger than 13.2 is skewed by spacetime curvatures(or just wrong) and B: the ability to see beyond the radius is also affecting the data.

yes, that is greater than 13.7 although wrong. The correct figure is closer to 13.2.

It isn't? Why not?

Actually the whole universe is only about 13.2 billion years old so no star is that old.

The total Mass of the universe is the Unified field force divided by 2 times the diameter of the universe. Ifthe units don't check out it's because physicists don't understand time right now.

The radius of the Universe is exactly the magnitude in light-years that it's age is in years.

String Theory is aonly an approximation. It isn't the an absolute unifying theory.