Recent content by poom

I have read this paper http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1355219813000695 that the author try to said that einstein not believe that gravity is not cause the space time curvature. I want to know that this is true or not. Because when I have read about general relativity I always...

http://www.jstor.org/stable/1968714?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. This is einstein article what do you think about it

He try to mean that there are no gravitational wave in weak field but there are gravitattional wave in strong field.Does I understand it right??

Why did it contrast with rhe second order approximation can you explain more for me.

It seem like history question but I want to know the 1938 idea of einstein gravitational wave.I don't understand it's meaning so I need someone to explain me what einstein real meaning

This is the paper in 1938. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1968714?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

In 1916 Einstein has published the first paper of gravitational wave bu linearize approximation but It contain an error of his calculation then In 1918 he published a new paper of gravitational wave that has a correction of the his last error and conclude that there are the Gravitational wave...

what is the former and latter that you mean ? about changing in einstein's theory ?

Why you said that ? http://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-trans/213 His calculation has some mistake but he said about the gravitational wave.

Because other comment said that there are many thing were changed by other physicists after einstein.

And What about his book http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Relativity:_The_Special_and_General_Theory . Does it's substance inside the book different from today's lecture ??

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Foundation_of_the_Generalised_Theory_of_Relativity Do you think that today version of GR is more clearer or easier than this version of Einstein ?? Why I think that this paper is so clear for physicists

sorry for the first link I have edited it yet http://www.andyross.net/weinberg.htm

http://www.andyross.net/weinberg.htm In number 4 Steven Weinberg said that Traditional religions generally rely on authority, such as a prophet or a pope or an imam, or a body of sacred writings. Scientists rely on authorities of a very different sort. If I want to understand some fine point...