Recent content by Qiward

MatterWave, Great. You have made this clear now. I appreciate your convincing explanation.

Thanks a lot for your explanation. If t and x are what you said, then I guess non-relativistic QM is a bit too ad hoc, and hence not a satisfactory theory to me. I will study quantum field theory. Thanks for the info you give. Regarding my derivation, there are indeed both Ap and pA terms...

Matterwave, thanks a lot for your very helpful reply, and sorry about my errors. Question #1: time t is not an observable? why? Can you shed some light? If p and x are observables, then t should be observable as well since p = mdx/dt. In addition, t = x/c if you use speed of light as a unit...

I now show some derivations regarding quantum commutators,leading to some inconsistencies. Can someone tell what went wrong? What causes the inconsistencies? and what is the correct way of understanding/handling the concepts? Issue # 1 - Hamiltonian and commutation with time (1) The...