Recent content by RafaMarce

You can make an association with mass and wave lenght, or wave length and momentum. Holds true for photons ( carrier momentum,through radiation, but don't have mass) and to particles with mass.

1) The choose of c=1, implies that your measures ( equipaments) is calibrated in another system of coordinates, not meter, second... You can make this change if you keep in mind that the dimension of your quantities was change. 2) This relation come from the relation of energy and momentum of...

I think that the electron cannot be found in the nucleus, because the uncertainty principle will require a momentum uncertainty so high, so inside the nucleus it's worse. So i think you have to calculate the uncertainty in momentum of electron in nucleus surface, and use the relativistic energy...

Can you show your KG equation here?

A particle with mass "fell" gravity through gravitons, but a good question arise: What is the propagator for particles with spin-2? And why spin-2?? I'll search more about this...

I think "yes", we have to choose the point where all fields vanish to do the expansion of lagrangean... There is a possible vacuum state in this point. But this is a trivial solution, i think is the only place where we have massless gauge boson, since that the symmetry is broken.