Recent content by rchase

Does the path of a charged particle in a weak magnetic field absorb photons in a quantized to curve it's path, or just interact with the background field? The question is, is everything end up photons, or not all electromagnetic interactions? Or do we only consider the wave photons when it hits...

if there were as many Ganges rivers as the sand-grains of the Ganges, would the sand-grains of them all be many? (Good night.)

Has a background of very densely interfered photons been ever mathematically substituted for the waves? I presume this might align with concepts like loop gravity etc... Are there any theories which define vacuum fluctuations as a sea of interfering photons?

ppzmis has given me something to think about. I do have some "personal misthinkings" interfering with my complete acceptance of theory. I'm sure this is easy to relate to. Theories always seem to be incomplete, yet useful. Useful is what matters ultimately. (The point of the scientific method is...

ppzmis has given me something to think about. I do have some "personal misthinkings" interfering with my acceptance of theory. I'm sure this is easy to relate to.

I'm receiving infractions due to speculation and personal theory. Hard get answers without speculation about misunderstanding. And hard to talk about examples of phenomena misunderstood without them being called personal theories.

I don't know that the problem of one photon is the same problem of many photons, especially in regards to anticoherent light. I suspect in cases where light is homogenously mixed, there might be the potential to encounter photons with some uncertianty. When it comes to one photon, where there is...

...What if there are two pinholes; does it produce a cone of partially diffracted anticoherent light? I suppose the answer would be the sum of the potential combinations. Lastly, my question is about an antenna designed to emit a anti coherent wave. Supposing the emitter is ramped up in a...

I've done some 'homework'. I am advised that the wave nature only indicates a probability of where the photon will land. Also that the energy can be created and destroyed as quickly as photons interfere, but this does not mean that the photons are destroyed. A homogeneous mixture of photons in...

So if I create a beam of light, and just interfere it destructively in a beam splitter, and the photons are not destroyed, but never appear to reach their target, because the photon pressure is zero? Were they absorbed while anti-coherent?

Next question #3 I presume a recombined dim beam imparts less photon momentum to a target than the two beams seperately?

To up the ante. Somtimes one can't be sure what the answer is until you've seen it in the lab... Consider a beam of coherent light which is recombined at half a wavelength off, I presume that can highly dim the beam. If we put a diffraction filiter, (the equivalent of a faraday cage) in front...

I'm just saying I can create a lot of noise where the probability of sensing a photon is equally likely and homogeniously mixed so the net electromagnetic affect to the antenna is zero. So that the fluctuation in intensity of photon impacts still increases and decreases. Thank you for helping me...

Glad to see you're interested, I have some bugs to work out. I would use more than two sources and many more than two photons. If I told you woudn't that spoil the invention? Do you have connections with a security clearance :)? I'm not exactly going around telling everyone how it works before...

Exactly there are some interfered photons. My question is about the things we can't see, are there more missing photons all around us which can't be recovered? Can we setup an emitter which emits an entirely canceled wave. If so, is there a sea of photons which are essentially summing to zero...