Recent content by real10

This might be helpful...integrating sums...(technique using falling factorials) http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/dgleich/publications/Gleich%202005%20-%20finite%20calculus.pdf

interesting post... As to the original poster, If your State undergrad Eng is good +accredited+locally respected then there is no reason to go elsewhere unless u are getting lot of aid/money etc... As Far as I know state eng schools are usually good in a lot of places (choose the best campus...

MATLAB is your best bet to play around with the wavelet transform (i think they even have a toolbox) -IEEE access and do some digging on the transforms (esp if someone used the output of them as the input to a neural network simulation) and how others have applied it.. I used the wavelet...

I agree at undergrad level CV it was more linear algebra (transformations) on the other hand in almost all of EE -> statistics/probability is inherent and inescapable due to the ever present noise (real world situations) and modeling anything (data or noise) often requires one to characterize...

To the original poster, I just took the GRE recently and ended up with 760 on the math section...so yeah don't lose hope if u didnt do as well in high school...people end up doing better later on down the road...(i did better at penn state compared to HS and same...

try to avoid doing something OVER and Over...focus more on understanding especially for EE & Math...understand and then do some examples for practice... for example...understand what the Fourier transform really is (basically the series version converted to continuous...) though memorizing...

i got 650 in math sat. 680 on the 2c/physics nothing great...but kept working/studying...ended up with 3.55/4.00 (round to 3.6 yeah at Penn State College EE 4 years) did well math classes undergrad...garbageload of selfstudying via books,internet..to keep up with smarter people around me...ups...

yes it is just the amplitude as I said [( 2/5)^2 + (1/5)^2 ] ^1/2 = +-0.45

no not between -1 and 1 that is for individual terms.You have to combine them into 1 cosine term and the new amplitude is ur answer. use the below formula: A sint + B cost = (A^2+B^2 ) ^(1/2) * Cos(t-arctan(b/A))

well the original poster wanted to show that it was equal to pi/2 maybe I misunderstood the question... EDIT: Also I(0) can't be used for finding C as u get the integral u want to evaluate...

The the explanation below might clarify... from http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/classes/de/definitions.aspx nitial Condition(s) are a condition, or set of conditions, on the solution that will allow us to determine which solution that we are after. Initial conditions (often abbreviated i.c.’s...

lol sorry EE undergraduate hehe EDIT: everything changed to i now

for second question a quicker way is to convert to the polar form and then u can see the angle of z1/z2 for first question i=e^i*pi/2 (since sine(pi/2)=1) raise this to "i" power u immediately get e^-pi/2.

because the solution would have to satisfy the differential equations which would contain n derivatives for n the order equation.

I(x)=\int_0^{+\infty}e^{-xy}\frac{\sin y}{y}dy So I(\infty) = 0 now use this initial condition to find const C and u are done 0 = -arctan(\infty)+C C= \frac{\pi}{2}