renormalize's latest activity
-
Rrenormalize reacted to BillTre's post in the thread Beyond the Bots: Why High-Level Support Needs a Real Soul with
Like.
Guess I hit the reply rather than report button. -
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Beyond the Bots: Why High-Level Support Needs a Real Soul.I have already reported this as spam to the mentors. Based on past experience, it should soon disappear!
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Hello from an Independent Researcher in Cosmology.Welcome to Physics Forums, but do note that discussing unpublished personal work is not allowed here: Speculative or Personal Theories...
-
RFrom my wedding.
-
Rrenormalize reacted to PeterDonis's post in the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets with Like.
The OP is based on several incorrect claims, which have been corrected. This thread is now closed. Thanks to all who responded.
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets.But that observation in itself does not falsify Mach's principle, which seems to be the goal of your rather disjointed arguments; i.e...
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets.I ask you again: please cite a credible physics reference that espouses that version of Mach's principle and quote the specific passage...
-
Rrenormalize reacted to Ibix's post in the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets with Like.
That statement seems to be a flat denial of Mach's Principle. Fine - but unless you can justify it from first principles then your...
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets.Again, you make an assertion without providing credible proof. Please cite a physics reference that actually states that inertial mass...
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets.That argument is not persuasive. How do you know that the inertial mass ##m## doesn't depend on the gravitational constant ##G## such...
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets.Water climbing the walls of a bucket rotating relative to the fixed stars is an empirical result observed in our universe where ##G\neq...
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets.Nope. Your Bondi & Samuel reference enumerates 10 versions of Mach's principle (some of which are contradictory!) and discusses their...
-
-
Rrenormalize reacted to gmax137's post in the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets with Like.
I don't think I've seen that before, where does it come from?
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets.Can you cite a physics reference that defines "strong Mach" in this way? I ask because, to my understanding, Mach's principle applies...
-
Rrenormalize replied to the thread Undergrad Mach's principle vs two counter-rotating buckets.I don't see the validity of your argument. Consider this quote about Mach's principle from S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology, pg...
