renormalize's latest activity

Seeing if the "methodology holds up" is exactly what the referees agree to do when a journal evaluates submitted work. Get your paper...

Seeking feedback on a personal theory is disallowed by the forum rules you agreed to when you joined. From the rules: Speculative or...

While that's true if you insist on zero uncertainty in location, you may instead use a medium like photographic film to continuously...

I agree more or less, but that was essentially my point. The proposed definition of observer is excessively broad. If an SR-observer is...

Even though I have read the Bell paper you cited, I am, alas, not knowledgeable enough about "beables" to intelligently advise you. That...

Then it should be possible for you to cite an exposition of that composition that lies within "published work". Please do so.

Thanks for the references. Given that admission, can we readers conclude that your take on the combination of decoherence and the...

Can you supply a specific reference that explicitly states this (in so many words) about the Dirac current?

I agree. But don't miss the context in which I said what I said. My claim was that the Bohmian position of a microscopic particle is a...

It's certainly likely that I am not understanding your point about "seeing" elementary particles. So let me instead clearly state my...

True, but that's not a fundamental limitation. Instead of photographic film, using a plastic detector like CR-39 yields proton tracks...

Did you mean to say "a microscopic particle such as electron"? Even so, I don't understand your comment about only observing "an...

Maudlin's work has been discussed before on Physics Forums...

Google Scholar is your friend; give it a try! Here's a 40 year old paper that addresses your question: A duality property of planar...

Looks like the LaTeX Guide is fixed now. Thanks Greg!