Recent content by Riichiro Mizoguchi

  1. R

    Centrifugal forces don't exist in reality?

    I'm afraid there might be a misunderstanding. Not F but -F. F is the force the wall pushes O and -F is the force O pushes the wall. The notion of the net force is defined for describing motion caused by forces. It doesn't affect the existence of those forces. In the case of two persons push me...
  2. R

    Centrifugal forces don't exist in reality?

    No. I mean if O is exerting a reactive outward force, ... No. I don't ignore them because my goal is to show the existence of a particular kind of force. There is no cancelation of forces when we are not talking about motion caused by forces. Imagine you are pushed by two persons in opposite...
  3. R

    Centrifugal forces don't exist in reality?

    Thanks for your reply. OK, if the situation I imagine is not appropriate, then please imagine another one which shows a pair of centripetal and reactive centrifugal forces exist and try to evaluate my explanation of the intuitive proof.
  4. R

    Centrifugal forces don't exist in reality?

    This is my first post to the forum. This is not a reply to any of the past posts but is related to the main topic of centrifugal force. I understand we agree that at least in the context of contact force when an object O is in a circular motion a reactive centrifugal force exerting BY O exists...
  5. R

    Why is Newtonian physics counter-intuitive?

    I'm an AI researcher who is interested in physics education. I've been wondering why Newtonian physics is so counter-intuitive.
Back
Top