Sambuco's latest activity

While it does not talk about the trajectory beyond what is minimally implied by the transition maps, it does commit to an ontology. At...

Interesting! I suppose that, given the stochastic-quantum correspondence, such post-selected transition maps should also be valid in...

As an aside: Barandes derives a "dictionary" form for transition maps $$\Gamma_{ij}(t\leftarrow 0) = \mathrm{tr}P_i(t)P_j$$I anticipate...

I think it's possible to distinguish the stochastic-quantum correspondence theorem from an interpretation based on a specific ontology...

I agree with your last two posts. Thanks @Morbert! :smile: As an aside, it seems to me that Barandes's formulation does not necessarily...

@Sambuco Maybe the conversation can be refocused by telling me which statement you disagree with. i) The transition map of the entire...

I'm not sure what you mean by "the stochastic map is now [...]". The stochastic map of the universe ##\tilde{\Gamma}(t\leftarrow 0)## is...

No. What I said (or at least tried to say) is that if there is information (even in the environmental degrees of freedom) about the...

I agree, but... The issue I tried to address in my last post is about how it is possible, within Barandes's formulation, to restrict the...

I will attempt to describe a position that seems reasonable to me. First, transition matrices define a nomological entity that is only...

I think the main motivation for the collapse postulate is that repeated measurements should yield the same outcomes. That's true if...

I think you're confusing two different things. For interference to occur, the different branches of the wave function must recombine...

Let me try to rephrase this question for @Morbert. The "branches" being talked about here are branches of the wave function. The...

If I understand correctly, you're saying that, in some way, all the branches are still present, even though the probability of...

I'm not sure which of the following two possibilities you're referring to when you say that ##p(z_i\omega_i, t | z_j\omega_j,t') =...